More on the pinkwashing of the Day of Pink

9 Apr
me and d

I do wear pink occasionally. But only in the form of hot pants.

Well, then. I guess a few people liked the post I put up in haste the other night, while simultaneously entertaining my almost three year-old and responding to a flurry of Tweets. Or they disagreed with me, but felt compelled to read it. Either way, I’m grateful.

My reason for criticizing the choice of Laureen Harper as the ambassador for the Day of Pink was very clear to me. I believed strongly that we needed to make sure that queer/trans youth knew we had their backs — not just in a symbolic sense, but politically too.

I remember when I testified in Ottawa in support of provincial legislation mandating gay-straight alliances in publicly funded schools. I listened to speakers from the Catholic board and the evangelical right use syrupy language to try and strategically remove the queerness from any anti-bullying efforts. They spoke of the need for “diversity clubs” and other meaningless monikers that obscure the specific and excruciating struggles that queer, trans and gender non-conforming youth face in schools.

We need to keep the focus on the specific experiences of kids like Leelah Alcorn, Blake Brockington and Jamie Hubley (may they rest in power and peace). And that means fighting school boards to ensure that queer/trans kids are supported and given spaces in which to meet. It means advocating for trans human rights legislation like Bill C-279 and naming and shaming the politicians like Don Plett who are holding back progress. And it also means holding LGBT organizations accountable when they choose respectability politics over the rights of the people they purport to serve.

I want to take a minute to address some of the criticism I have seen over the last couple of days. Much of it was thoughtful and I would like to acknowledge the people who engaged with me on Twitter and in other online spaces.

1. Why are you judging Laureen Harper by the actions of her husband? 

I am judging Laureen Harper by her complicity in the Conservative publicity machine. See? She even has her own page on the party’s website. She has stood by her husband during every election and has allowed herself to be used as a humanizing factor to help tone down his look of evil. (Well, that, a sweater vest and kittens). And her rather vapid statement in support of the Day of Pink did not make a single mention of queer or trans youth.

She has never made a public comment that contradicted the policies of the Conservative party. And Laureen certainly has not said a word about trans rights or Bill C-279. Should she choose to prove me wrong one day, I would be thrilled. But until that day arrives, she has positioned herself politically as Mrs. Harper and that is what I will call her.

2. Why are you wasting your energy criticizing a group that does good work?

Because this organization — formerly known as Jer’s Vision — has re-branded itself as a national LGBT organization. By choosing the new name of the Canadian Centre for Gender and Sexual Diversity, this group is carving out a voice on the national stage. And that comes with responsibility. The fact that the CCGSD’s first action out of the gate is to associate themselves with the Harpers is really bad news. It shows a preference for name recognition and banal “awareness-raising” over real justice for queer and trans youth. And their misstep only serves to benefit the politicians and right-wing evangelicals who would be thrilled to see queer and trans people banned from public bathrooms.

It seriously concerns me that the CCGSD’s reaction to public criticism yesterday was either to invite people to have private conversations with them (and therefore take the conversation offline) or implying that critics were contributing to toxic activist cultures by not being kind enough. I and many others responded publicly to a very public piece of communication. The discussion and process of accountability should remain in the public sphere.

3. But have you heard the rumour about Laureen Harper?

I live in Ottawa and I have heard the rumours that Laureen may be a secret member of “the family.” But unless she distinguishes herself from the Conservative machine, she’s never going to be invited to any lesbian potlucks. To paraphrase an old Ani Difranco song, “I don’t give a fuck who she’s screwing in private, I wanna know who she’s screwing in public.”

Advertisements

7 Responses to “More on the pinkwashing of the Day of Pink”

  1. Roxxroxx April 10, 2015 at 4:03 am #

    Very interesting, even though I’m miles from Canada. Thank you.

  2. ET April 10, 2015 at 7:26 am #

    Jer’s Vision commissioned an anti-bullying Fringe play a few years back.

    Jer’s remarks to the audience after the play included this gem: “if you like it tell your friends, if you don’t keep your fucking mouth shut”.

    He was bullying about anti-bullying, and he was only half-joking. I mention this to laud your decision to stay public with your criticism.

    There is much of worth in what Jer’s Vision does/ has done. As the names you remembered in your post chillingly remind us, high school is an incredibly dangerous time for kids that are othered, and campaigns that can help to keep them safe are a huge step in the right direction.

    But merely making a “fairness” argument in favour of diversity is pretty weak sauce.

    Being a patriarchal construct through-and-through, it is essential to our current government to create “enemy others” to draw away any critical examination of itself, and surely it lets the government off the hook — and betrays progressive movements of all types — to invite one of its spokespeople (Mrs. H) to advocate on behalf of victims.

    Is it slowing becoming less acceptable to bully people because of their sexuality? We all dearly hope so, but it is no credit at all to the likes of the CPC if it is. But if that avenue of oppression gradually closes up? Well, thankfully, in the mindset of our political masters, there are plenty of other “others” waiting in the wings, and as the Harper government has shown with the Niqab debate, those others will be pushed out to centre stage and publicly vilified, as required.

    Surely it’s that perpetual need to find “others” and throw them under the bus that we need to examine when we talk about how bullies get away with it, and it seems to me that Day of Pink is wasting that opportunity.

  3. vandandy April 10, 2015 at 4:23 pm #

    Thanks Ariel. Smart, insightful, respectful. When an organization that purports to be progressive utilizes sleezy Harperian/CPC strategies of “you’re with us or against us” in the face of critical analyses – at the same time as cozying up with an actual Harper – it should be a clear signal to true progressives that we must speak out against their self-anointed authority. In establishing a national organization, CCGSD will undoubtedly expand it’s efforts to ‘represent’ LGBTQ voices, interests, needs through/to the media, policy makers, and legislators. Sidling up to far right, Christian Conservatives clearly justifies our skepticism and scrutiny.

  4. rich96 April 10, 2015 at 10:52 pm #

    Fashion faux paus
    You have larger thighs and the pink hotpants brings too much attention to them

    • Queer Femme Mama April 11, 2015 at 5:16 am #

      You clearly got the point of this post. Thanks for the illuminating feedback. I would be happy to provide similar constructive feedback, should you choose to share a photo of your own ass in hot pants. Needless to say, I’ve received no complaints.

  5. Fennec April 11, 2015 at 4:50 pm #

    Isn’t it a little ironic that you’re interested in protecting queer/trans youth but really unabashedly dragged a 20 year old queer youth through the mud? Or did you not bother to check that the girl who made the statement was pretty much half your age and a part of the demographic you say CCGSD isn’t supporting?

    • Queer Femme Mama April 11, 2015 at 5:15 pm #

      Thanks for your comment. I am not sure what you are referring to. I have only asked for an organizational response and criticized public communication put out by the organization. In fact, I find it concerning that the founder and Executive Director has been silent on this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: